Ski season is here, and along with sweeping white mountain views, powder turns, and endless (in a good way) skin tracks, comes the responsibility to
tune up on avalanches and risk. I go through a simple but deliberate annual routine,
brushing up a bit on snow safety, evaluating my avalanche risk assessment from
the past season, and setting goals and expectations for the coming season. It is also a
good opportunity to reflect on friends who have died or had close calls in the
mountains.
Last year, I modified my approach to travel in avalanche
terrain, continually choosing moderate terrain over more exposed options. And
while I didn’t ski as much steep terrain as in the past, I like the increased margin of safety. It is also nice to move
quickly and safely through the mountains unencumbered by extensive pit digging and stress. I also notched my “go/no-go” risk threshold back a touch. The clearest
example is that I no longer treat Moderate avalanche conditions as safe unless proven otherwise.
I have also deepened my skepticism of group avalanche assessment in parties
larger than about four, preferring moderate objectives and terrain choices that keep the group moving rather than stuck
at the top of a run hemming and hawing and discussing the finer points of how representative the pit was, or how best to execute a sketchy ski cut.
However, there is no escaping the fact that I thrive on challenge and adventure, and am OK with taking calculated risks when conditions merit. With a clear mind,
attention to detail, and deep reserve of experience and tricks, I still value laying
it out there a bit and staying sharp. Without the drive to push and explore, I would not have suggested or skirting slabs in search of a safe line into Sweathouse creek during our amazing Glen Lake/Sweathouse/Hidden Lake Peak/Bear Creek tour last spring, or continuing out to the summit of Castle crag, both of which involved careful avalanche assessment, but were still within the realm of acceptable risk, even in retrospect. Here’s to another year of
adventure out in the snow. And not losing sight of the fact that we are making life and death decisions every day we spend in the mountains.
I found this interactive series on human factors and heuristics from POWDER magazine
intriguing.
Also, for current conditions, Mr. Fredlund’s assessment is
spot on, with the exception that deep facets the
Missoula/Bitterroot/Rattlesnake seems to be a touch more consolidated.
Thanks. Yeah, I think it is important for everyone consciously work on risk assessment, so my intent was just to lay out a few specific if not random snippets and encourage others to do the same. For error margins, while it is for sure important to keep a reasonable margin of error, I am also interested in the concept of operating with a large margin of error 95+% of the time, but allowing for a razor thin margin with the right conditions, the right partner, and for the right objective. Except that I am getting old and responsible and am slowly loosing the drive to push it on occasion.
ReplyDelete