Near the bottom of the first run, looking out to Riddell lakes and a sea of clouds at dawn. |
I started skinning from the truck at 4:40 am, and followed Blake's ski tracks up through the icy fog until it broke right at Riddell lake. After stashing the headlamp, I climbed the south couloir by moonlight, topping out at dawn. The south couloir skied perfectly - very firm but edgable, with smooth snow from top to bottom.
All smiles at dawn at the top of the South couloir. |
Looking down the South couloir out to a sea of clouds at dawn. |
Fine turns below the South couloir. |
Happy at Scenic lakes after a successful descent of the East couloir. |
At the top of the East couloir. |
Chalky snow in the West couloir. |
Sun break, geting psyched up for the big push up the west face to the summit. |
Thinking of you, Chris. |
Below the North face, looking back up at the ski line. |
Heading home. Just enough snow to ski cleanly out to the car on the trail. |
Thoughts
This is a great tour. It is long but not too long, techy but not too difficult, committing but not too dangerous, and the skiing is amazing. I was glad to have perfect conditions. Upon my semi-recommendation, the brothers Vandenbos did the same tour the following day. Nice work Nick and Ben! Today was a reminder that with good conditions, mid-winter ski mountaneering can be safer and easier than spring skiing. No runnels, no glare ice, no falling rocks, no hiking out in ski boots. All good things. This was also a good example of why I advocate for using light gear, since the light kit allowed me to move efficiently up the climbs, was adequate to fully enjoy the downhills, and allowed me to stay relaxed all day and still be back at the car well before dark.
In terms of conditions, I found stable, deep snow everywhere. The road is plowed to Twin Lakes, and it is icy but passable even to low clearance vehicles with snow tires. The Riddell trail has a lot of donwnfall, but there is enough snow that one barely notices. I am trying to get away from touring in spandex, but I did wear the racing suit, and it was, well, pretty much perfect. This was my first day steep skiing on the Nanga Parbats. They did OK. The early rise tail doesn't seem to provide as much support as I would have liked, and they don't appear to edge like the Broad Peak skis did, but they held their own, even with relatively flimsy boots. The chatter I was expecting never came, which was a surprise for such light skis. I would want a more traditional ski for really technical, icy skiing, but for my purposes the Nanga Parbats seem to be sufficient to get down the steep stuff, and have proven to be quite nimble and playful for their small size. So, 1.8 thumbs up for now.
Statistics
Approximate total elevation gain (based on topo map): 10,500 feet
Trip length: a little north of 10 hours
Accomplices: None
Put in: Random turnout near Twin Lakes
Take out: Same
Ski equipment: Dynafit Nanga Parbat skis, TLT speed race bindings, Scarpa Alien boots, One whippet, and one race pole. Spandex suit, Camp Nanotech crampons, Ski crampons. Helmet.
Sustinance: Cold Taco del Sol buritto and cold coffee for breakfast. 2 liters of water with Perpetum and Hammer Fizz. 1.5 king size Snickers bars, two granola bars, bag of peanuts 500 calories of Gu.
Number of crampon transitions: 8
Trailbreaking effort: None
Avalanche conditions: Low, but moderate danger from falling snow and ice.
Fatigue factor (1-10): 7
Stoke factor (1-10): 10
Memories to suppress: Dark and foggy morning.
In terms of conditions, I found stable, deep snow everywhere. The road is plowed to Twin Lakes, and it is icy but passable even to low clearance vehicles with snow tires. The Riddell trail has a lot of donwnfall, but there is enough snow that one barely notices. I am trying to get away from touring in spandex, but I did wear the racing suit, and it was, well, pretty much perfect. This was my first day steep skiing on the Nanga Parbats. They did OK. The early rise tail doesn't seem to provide as much support as I would have liked, and they don't appear to edge like the Broad Peak skis did, but they held their own, even with relatively flimsy boots. The chatter I was expecting never came, which was a surprise for such light skis. I would want a more traditional ski for really technical, icy skiing, but for my purposes the Nanga Parbats seem to be sufficient to get down the steep stuff, and have proven to be quite nimble and playful for their small size. So, 1.8 thumbs up for now.
Statistics
Approximate total elevation gain (based on topo map): 10,500 feet
Trip length: a little north of 10 hours
Accomplices: None
Put in: Random turnout near Twin Lakes
Take out: Same
Ski equipment: Dynafit Nanga Parbat skis, TLT speed race bindings, Scarpa Alien boots, One whippet, and one race pole. Spandex suit, Camp Nanotech crampons, Ski crampons. Helmet.
Sustinance: Cold Taco del Sol buritto and cold coffee for breakfast. 2 liters of water with Perpetum and Hammer Fizz. 1.5 king size Snickers bars, two granola bars, bag of peanuts 500 calories of Gu.
Number of crampon transitions: 8
Trailbreaking effort: None
Avalanche conditions: Low, but moderate danger from falling snow and ice.
Fatigue factor (1-10): 7
Stoke factor (1-10): 10
Memories to suppress: Dark and foggy morning.